Overview

Langfuse vs SigNoz: LLM-native vs general-purpose observability

Langfuse (31k+ stars) is LLM-native observability with trace + prompt management + evaluation as a stack. SigNoz (31k+ stars) is an OpenTelemetry-native general APM that treats LLM workloads as one of many. We compare positioning, protocol support, data model, extensibility, and typical scenarios.

Projects Compared

Langfuse

TypeScript · NOASSERTION

33.2k ★

Open-source LLM engineering platform providing tracing, evaluations, prompt management, and dataset management with integrations for LangChain, OpenAI, Anthropic, and more.

observabilitytracingllm-evaluationprompt-managementanalytics
View Project →

Feature Comparison

Best for Langfuse
Product positioning LLM-specific observability: trace, span, generation, prompt, and score are all first-class. UI is purpose-built for LLM debugging (slice by prompt, view feedback per user).
Protocol support OpenTelemetry plus dedicated Python / JS SDK plus LangChain / LlamaIndex integrations. LLM-as-judge and heuristic eval are built in.
Data model LLM-centric: traces contain generations (model calls), tools (tool calls), and scores (evaluations). Prompt versioning and user feedback are first-class.
Extensibility Prompt versioning, LLM-as-judge, custom scores, webhooks. Enough but not flexible.
Best fit Pure LLM products (ChatGPT-style app, agents, RAG) that need trace + prompt debugging + eval loop. First choice for LLM teams.

GitHub Stats

Metric Langfuse
Stars 33.2k
Forks 3.6k
Language TypeScript
License NOASSERTION
Last commit August 16, 2026

Which one should you choose?

Choose based on your primary workflow, language ecosystem, and integration needs. Review each project's documentation and recent GitHub activity before adopting it in production.

Frequently asked questions

Can Langfuse and SigNoz be used together?

Yes. A common pattern is SigNoz as the unified observability stack (trace plus metrics plus logs) and Langfuse as the LLM-specific UI (prompt debugging plus eval). Both support OpenTelemetry export, so a single collector can route data to different backends.

Which should I pick for an AI product?

Pick Langfuse for pure LLM products: trace plus prompt management plus eval plus user feedback in one place. Pick SigNoz for mixed workloads (traditional services included): unified observability costs less, and you can still trace LLM data but you organize attributes yourself.

What does the SigNoz ClickHouse backend buy you?

ClickHouse handles high-cardinality queries extremely fast, which fits LLM use cases that slice by user_id, prompt_id, or model. Langfuse uses ClickHouse for OLAP traces plus Postgres for OLTP; SigNoz is ClickHouse end-to-end and lighter to operate.

Can Langfuse only monitor LLMs?

No — anything OpenTelemetry-instrumented can send data. But the UI is LLM-centric. If you only run LLM applications, it is enough. If you also need to monitor API latency plus DB queries plus LLM in one stack, SigNoz is more general.